No instance for (Num [Integer]) arising from the literal ‘1’
plus1 :: [Integer] > [Integer] > [Integer]
plus1 (x:xs) remain
 (x==0) && (remain==1) = [1] ++ (plus1 xs (remain1) )
 (x==1) && (remain==1) = [0] ++ (plus1 xs remain)
 (x==0) && (remain==0) = [0] ++ (plus1 xs 0)
 (x==1) && (remain==0) = [1] ++ (plus1 xs 0)
 otherwise = []
• No instance for (Num [Integer]) arising from the literal ‘1’
• In the second argument of ‘(==)’, namely ‘1’
In the second argument of ‘(&&)’, namely ‘(remain == 1)’
In the expression: (x == 0) && (remain == 1)
1 answer

your type signature says that
remain
should be:: [Integer]
but you are comparing it with==
to1
with isInteger
. Perhaps your type signature was intended to beplus1 :: [Integer] > Integer > [Integer]
See also questions close to this topic

How could you use a CSV file to create a list of "Students" Where students is a custom data type?
I was tasked with an assignment where we were to search a binary search tree to see if certain things exist.I wish to implement a way such that the user can call the program pass in a CSV file, and a search function and it would create and search the tree. I was thinking of creating a list of Students, which is a data type containing 3 strings representing first name last name and major and an int representing age, using the CSV file and then inserting the elements of the list into the tree. The problem is I have never dealt with CSV files in Haskell and would like to know how to get started especially on how to read CSV files.

List comprehensions in Haskell
I want to write a simple list comprehension in Haskell which consists of a list of infinite primes.
My attempt:
isPrime 1 = False isPrime x = and [x `mod` z /= 0  z < [1..x1]] primes = [x  x <[1..], isPrime x ]
But when I try running this on console as
take 10 primes
it gets stuck! What is the issue? 
How do I translate this code from Haskell to C++?
{# OPTIONS_GHC O2 #} import Math.Combinatorics.Exact.Binomial import Data.Ratio import Data.List (foldl') kroneckerDelta a b  a == b = 1 % 1  otherwise = 0 % 1 g a b = ((1)^(a  b +1) * choose a b) % 1 coefficients :: Integral a => a > a > [Ratio a] > [Ratio a] coefficients p j cs  j < 0 = cs  otherwise = coefficients p (j  1) (c:cs) where c = f / g (j + 1) j f = foldl h (kroneckerDelta j p) (zip [j + 2..p + 1] cs) h accum (i,cf) = accum  g i j * cf trim r = let n = numerator r d = denominator r l = div n d in (mod l (10^9 + 7),(n  d * l) % d) s n p = numerator (a % 1 + b) where (a,b) = foldl' (\(i',r') (i,r) > (mod (i' + i) (10^9 + 7),r' + r)) (0,0) (zipWith (\c i > trim (c * n^i)) (coefficients p p []) [1..p + 1]) main = print (s (10^16) 1000)
I want to translate this piece of code written in Haskell to C++. Can someone help me? I don't know anything about Haskell.

Why is [0] === [0] false
If debugging shows that a variable is 0, then I think that I should be able to catch it with either ==='0' or ===0 but that didn't work. I had to use only == instead, then it worked:
var offset = 0; alert("## DEBUG non_sortable_columns " + non_sortable_columns) if (non_sortable_columns == '0'  non_sortable_columns == 0) { offset = 1; }
I first tried this but it didn't work:
var offset = 0; alert("## DEBUG non_sortable_columns " + non_sortable_columns) if (non_sortable_columns === '0'  non_sortable_columns === 0) { offset = 1; }
The value was [0] and
[0] === [0]
is false. How can it be false? 
What would the prefered data type for single letter or number
I am trying to create my first database based application that organizes technical drawings with their revision history.
For my class 'drawing', I don't know which data type to use for the revision numbers of the drawings.
The naming convention for drawing revisions works in a way that the drawing identifier starts with 0 (first drawing) and then goes up alphanumerical A, B, C, etc.
Sometimes our customers require a numerical naming convention (in the style of 0, 1, 2, 3, etc.)
Is it practical to just declare the variable as string or is there a simpler way to organize these values while still being able to sort the drawings in the correct sequence?
The reason why I ask, is that someone once told me that if working with databases requires some more thought than a regular application.

List append in pandas cell
I have a dataframe which contains list item in a column.
Example: df:
column1, column2, column3 1 'c' ['d'] 2 'x' [] 3 'foo' ['car']
so I want to append another item into column3
the result should be like this
column1, column2, column3 1 'c' ['d','t'] 2 'x' ['t'] 3 'foo' ['car','t']
Currently I use the method like this
df['column3']=df['column3'].apply(lambda x: x.append('t'))
But the the column3 became
column1, column2, column3 1 'c' none 2 'x' none 3 'foo' none
Wonder how to do that using apply function

Function composition, tuples and unpacking
(disclaimed: not a Python kid, so please be gentle)
I am trying to compose functions using the following:
def compose(*functions): return functools.reduce(lambda f, g: lambda x: f(g(x)), functions, lambda x: x)
which works as expected for scalar functions. I'd like to work with functions returning tuples and others taking multiple arguments, eg.
def dummy(name): return (name, len(name), name.upper()) def transform(name, size, upper): return (upper, size, name) # What I want to achieve using composition, # ie. f = compose(transform, dummy) transform(*dummy('Australia')) => ('AUSTRALIA', 9, 'Australia')
Since
dummy
returns a tuple andtransform
takes three arguments, I need to unpack the value.How can I achieve this using my
compose
function above? If I try like this, I get:f = compose(transform, dummy) f('Australia') Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "<stdin>", line 2, in <lambda> File "<stdin>", line 2, in <lambda> TypeError: transform() takes exactly 3 arguments (1 given)
Is there a way to change
compose
such that it will unpack where needed? 
Algorithm that takes input and returns maximal product of a set of positive integers whose sum is N?
just doing an assignment and I'm having trouble with one of the sets.
"Write a function that takes a positive integer, N, and returns the maximal product of a set of positive integers whose sum is N. Invalid inputs should return 0, that is nonpositive integers or any integer where no set of at least 2 positive addends exists."
Example: 8 should return 18. as 8 can be written as 3 + 3 + 2 and the product of that set is 18.
I'm required to write a function for it in JavaScript.

Removing Duplication In Ramda Function
How can I remove the duplicated calls to
findIndexInO
incompareIndexes
?const a = [ {name: 'charlie', value: 1}, {name: 'bravo', value: 7}, {name: 'delta', value: 12}, {name: 'alpha', value: 19}, ] const propEqName = propEq('name'); const findIndexInO = findIndex(__, a); const compareIndexes = comparator((from, to) => lt(findIndexInO(propEqName(from)), findIndexInO(propEqName(to)))) const sortOnIndex = sort(compareIndexes); const decideOrder = (...args) => sortOnIndex(args); decideOrder('delta', 'charlie'); // ['charlie', 'delta'] decideOrder('bravo', 'alpha'); // ['bravo', 'alpha'] decideOrder('alpha', 'charlie'); // ['charlie', 'alpha']