how to write Arima Equation using modeled output
I have a daily series from 3rd jan 2016  28 feb 2018
Below is the output of auto.arima
model < auto.arima(ts_268001_1,xreg=reg)
model
**Series: ts_268001_1
Regression with ARIMA(3,1,2)(1,0,0)[7] errors
Coefficients:
ar1 ar2 ar3 ma1 ma2 sar1 promo_1 promo_2 promo_3
0.4655 0.5651 0.2229 0.0372 0.8954 0.1261 14.2482 9.3060 4.6454
promo_4 promo_5 Xmas
10.9198 6.3006 31.8271
s.e.
0.0496 0.0485 0.0417 0.0332 0.0308 0.0424 2.4490 2.7639 3.8073
s.e. 1.5005 0.8855 3.5790
sigma^2 estimated as 32.87:
log likelihood=2257.83
AIC=4541.66
AICc=4542.18
BIC=4601.1**
How to write the the equation so that I can directly use the equation to calculate the values.?
What is this "sar1"?
Where is my intercept?
See also questions close to this topic

How to make a function that loops over two lists
I have an event A that is triggered when the majority of coin tosses in a series of tosses comes up heads. I have an unfair coin and I'd like to see how the likelihood of A changes as the number of tosses change and the probability in each toss changes.
This is my function assuming 3 tosses
n < 3 #victory requires majority of tosses heads #tosses only occur in odd intervals k < seq(n/2+.5,n) victory < function(n,k,p){ for (i in p) { x < 0 for (i in k) { x < x + choose(n, k) * p^k * (1p)^(nk) } z < x } return(z) } p < seq(0,1,.1) victory(n,k,p)
My hope is the
victory()
function would1  find the probability of each of the outcomes where the majority of tosses are heads, given a particular value p
2  sum up those probabilities and add them to a vector z
3  go back and do the same thing given another probability pI tested this with
n < 3, k < c(2,3)
andp < (.5,.75)
and the output was 0.75000, 0.84375. I know that the output should've been 0.625, 0.0984375. 
Exponentiation of Log Transformed Values in Mixed Effects Model
I have run a linear mixedeffects model in R using the nlme package in which my response variable (Proximal_Lead_Bowing) was transformed to log10 scale (Log_Bowing) due to a non normal distribution of values. The estimated differences in Log_Bowing between different Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes (DBS_Electrode) as estimated by the model using the "glht" function for multiple comparisons of means (Tukey contrasts) are as follows: (View screenshot for full glht() output: https://imgur.com/WVJ9KM6)
Linear Hypothesis: Medtronic 3389  Boston Scientific Versice == 0 Estimate: 0.5766* St. Jude Medical Infinity  Boston Scientific Versice == 0 Estimate: 0.2208 St. Jude Medical Infinity  Medtronic 3389 == 0 Estimate:0.3558* *Denotes significance
Exponentiating these values (10^Abs(Estimate)) provide me with the following estimates for true differences in Proximal_Lead_Bowing as estimated by our mixedeffects model:
Linear Hypothesis: Medtronic 3389  Boston Scientific Versice == 0 3.77 (in millimeters) St. Jude Medical Infinity  Boston Scientific Versice == 0 1.66 St. Jude Medical Infinity  Medtronic 3389 == 0 2.27
These values do not make sense considering that the the average Proximal_Lead_Bowing ± 95% CI for each DBS_Electrode in the sample is as follows:
Boston Scientific Versice: 2.10 ± 0.67 (in millimeters) Medtronic 3389: 2.95 ± 0.58 St. Jude Medical Infinity: 2.00 ± 0.35
Thus I would expect true differences in Proximal_Lead_Bowing as estimated by our linear mixed model to be estimated as approximately 1.0 mm between Medtronic 3389 and the other DBS_Electrode models but instead the exponentiated values I have calculated don't seem to make sense. Am I missing something in the process of exponentiation of log10 values and/or use of the "glht" function for multiple comparisons of means? Any feedback would be appreciated.

What kind of Statistic Method for enrichment or overrepresent should I used for a rank ordered vector with Binary status
I have a gene expression data from 1065 different cell lines, let's say "BRAF" gene. BRAF gene expression levels are ordered. Most TP53 mutated cell lines are high BRAF expression (see the figure below). So what kind of statistical method should I use to test the enrichment or overrepresent for TP53 status (WT vs Mutant) on BRAF expression?

Which are the coefficients of the endogenous and exogenous variables in ARMA model in statsmodels summary in python
I was fitting the ARMA model with an endogenous variable (X) and an exogenous variable (Y) and the model is the matrix form AX  BY = M. I am looking for extracting the coefficient matrices A and B. After fitting the model I am getting results as that of in the following link https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/280507/generatingequationfrompythonarmamodelsummary But could not understand which are A and B from the result summary. I appreciate if any one can help in this regard.

Phi Coefficient Calculation For Different Data values in two Columns in Pandas
I'm trying so obtain a matrix that dysplay all the phi coefficient result for all the genes that are present in a column.
I have a dataframe, named ALL, with the following structure:
Sample Gene Oth 0 A G2 Miss 1 A G3 Non 2 B G1 Non 3 C G4 Miss
What I intended to obtain was a matrix like:
G1 G2 G3 G4 G1 1 phi phi phi G2 phi 1 phi phi G3 phi phi 1 phi G4 phi phi phi 1
Where each phi is the corresponding phi coefficient value for the gene occurence column values.
Each phi value is calculated by the following formula:
n11*n00  n10n01 phi =  sqrt(A*B*C*D)
where,
y=1 y=0 total x=1 n11 n10 A x=0 n01 n00 B total C D n
n11 > the number of samples where both G1 and G2 occur
n10 > the number of samples where G1 occur but not G2
n01 > the number of samples where G2 occur but not G1
n00 > the number of samples where both G1 and G2 not occur
In example, calculating the phi coefficient for G1 and G2, is based on this table:
G1 G2 total G1 0 1 1 G2 1 1 2 total 1 2 n

Scoring Algorithm using Coefficients from Logistic Regression
I am trying to score a number of activities using the coefficients from the logistic regression model. I created an algorithm that duplicates a scored model, but it is more complex than I feel it needs to be. It will take the number of activities multiplying by the coefficient value and then create a score. I want it to scale from 1100, what I built goes from about 115. Any ideas?

time series on rolling returns using matlab is it correct or cointgration and other errors creep in
i was working on some financial data on matlab and using it for time series forecasting. there is a function in it periodicreturns(TotalReturnPrices,Period). if i choose a period of say 5 days it gives me rolling return periodic values with period 5. so for example i have prices like [100, 110, 120, 130, 120, 110, 100, 90, 95, 100, 105, 107, 100, 110, 108] so using the above function i get the returns as following: 1) (120100)/100 = 0.20; 2) (110110)/110=0; 3) (100120)/120=0.1667 etc... so i have around 10 rolling returns like this. now if i had say 1000 daily prices and i calculate rolling returns with period of say one month (around 26 days) and i have 974 such kind of rolling returns. can i use these returns for time series model estimation (arima, arimagarch etc) and forecasting? will using these kind of rolling returns introduce any kind of stationarity issues, cointegration errors etc? i'am a novice in time series so i don't have the slightest clue of errors using spurious data. but i just thought using rolling returns are we using overlapping data or data too close to each other. your help in this matter would be highly obliged. thanks azim

Does it make sense to train ARIMA by Grid Search?
I am using grid search method to find all combination of ARIMA hyper parameters p, d, q where p < 6, d < 3 and q < 6, and select one of them generating minimized MAPE value against my testing data. Using these hyper parameters to forecast. Does it make sense? I realize AIC is a very popular model selection criterion. However, whenever i select model based on lower AIC, the forecasting result is usually widely off...

Passing to auto.arima() regressors with nonzero variance
Is it possible to force
auto.arima()
drop columns with zerovariance? I have nearly 15 000 time series. Here is one example:Week_start Shop_Number Product_Id Sales Price Promo <dbl> <int> <int> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> 1 51 1 65494 12 3.10 0 2 52 1 65494 10 3.10 0 3 53 1 65494 8 3.10 1 4 54 1 65494 5 3.10 0 5 55 1 65494 14 3.10 0 6 56 1 65494 4 3.10 0
But not all time series have variance in Promo. I mean, for other shop and product, it is possible, that it was no promo.
auto.arima()
gives me an errorError in auto.arima(visits, xreg = xreg) : No suitable ARIMA model found
when I'm trying to pass regressor with zero variance (no promo). Should I separate time series with promo by hand or it is possible to force
auto.arima
do not consider regressors with zero variance?