Why is either casting or the use of generics necessary for adding Strings to ArrayLists in Java?

I'm trying to understand ArrayLists and in the process have realized I also need to understand generics, raw types, and more about type casting. I'm reading the Oracle tutorial and this is the example they give for why generics are helpful:

The following code snippet without generics requires casting:

List list = new ArrayList();
String s = (String) list.get(0);

What I don't understand is why type casting is necessary here because as far as I can tell 'list.get(0)' is of type 'String' before and after the typecasting. I used the code here to check the type, not sure if it's correct or not.

List list = new ArrayList();

Object obj= list.get(0);

Class cls=obj.getClass();

String answer = cls.getSimpleName();

String s = (String) list.get(0);

Object obj2= list.get(0);

Class cls2=obj2.getClass();

String answer2 = cls2.getSimpleName();

So I'm asking for an explanation as to why type casting is necessary here and in here non generic-ed Arraylists in general.

1 answer

  • answered 2018-07-20 16:46 John Kugelman

    The run-time type is String, but the compile-time type is Object. The compiler doesn't know what a raw ArrayList holds, so when you call get() it assigns a compile-time type of Object. An Object can't be assigned directly to a String, thus the cast.

    The cast is the developer's way of saying to the compiler, "You think it's a list of Objects, but trust me, the thing I'm pulling out is definitely a String."