CKeditor 3.6.4 set Toolbar Basic
I want to remove button to the toolbar in CKeditor 3.6.4
Based on the information here
https://docs-old.ckeditor.com/CKEditor_3.x/Developers_Guide/Toolbar
I have this config.js
/*
Copyright (c) 2003-2012, CKSource - Frederico Knabben. All rights reserved.
For licensing, see LICENSE.html or http://ckeditor.com/license
*/
CKEDITOR.editorConfig = function (config) {
// Define changes to default configuration here. For example:
// config.language = 'fr';
// config.uiColor = '#AADC6E';
config.toolbar_Basic =
[
['Bold', 'Italic', '-', 'NumberedList', 'BulletedList', '-', 'Link', 'Unlink', '-', 'About']
];
CKEDITOR.replace('editor1',
{
toolbar: 'Basic'
});
};
But the toolbar is not changed.
It stays as default.
<%@ Page Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeFile="Default.aspx.cs" Inherits="Default" %>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head runat="server">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title></title>
<script src="Scripts/ckeditor/adapters/jquery.js"></script>
<script src="Scripts/ckeditor/ckeditor.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(function () {
$('#TextBox1').ckeditor();
});
</script>
</head>
<body>
<form id="form1" runat="server">
<div>
<asp:TextBox ID="TextBox1" runat="server" TextMode="MultiLine" CssClass="ckeditor"></asp:TextBox>
</div>
</form>
</body>
</html>
See also questions close to this topic
-
Filter items in a listbox that have been added with json
Well I'm trying to list items that are from listbox created with UserControl and the text properties are defined with a json file.
This is my .json file:
{ "Games": { "Quantity": 2, "Title0": "SomeGame1", "Description0": "Fps game", "Image0": "Some image link", "Link0": "GameStore.com/Somegame1", "Title1": "SomeGame2", "Description1": "RPG game", "Image1": "Some image link", "Link1": "GameStore.com/Somegame2", } }
This is the code to load the games as items in the listbox:
string JsonFile = Environment.CurrentDirectory @"\Test.json"; dynamic jasonfile = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(JsonFile); GameUserControl[] Games = new GameUserControl[jasonfile["Games"]["Quantidade"]]; for (int quantity= 0; quantity < Games.Length; quantity++) { Games[quantity] = new GameUserControl(); Games[quantity].Descrição.Content = (jasonfile["Games"]["Title" + quantity]); Games[quantity].jog = (jasonfile["Games"]["Titulo" + quantity]); Games[quantity].lin = (jasonfile["Games"]["Link" + quantity]); string image = jasonfile["Games"]["Image" + quantity]; Games[quantity].imag = new ImageBrush(new BitmapImage(new Uri(image, UriKind.Absolute))); GamesListBox.Items.Add(Games[quantity]); }
This is the code I used in a textbox to try to filter:
if (CollectionViewSource.GetDefaultView(GamesListBox.Items) != null) CollectionViewSource.GetDefaultView(GamesListBox.Items).Filter = (o) => { return o.ToString().ToLower().Contains(Search.Text.ToLower()); };
But it didn't work, the item names are always GameUserContro.Can someone help me?
-
Advantage of .Net Core over WCF for RESTful APIs
We are currently using WCF to create RESTful APIs, it is working fine and has an added advantage that it can be consumed via SOAP too if we ever need to. We have all our systems using Microsoft technologies.
There is no active development on WCF but the current functionality is working fine for us. However, I believe the recommended approach is to start using .Net core for RESTful services. What are the additional advantages .Net core offers over WCF (apart from being platform independent)?
-
Generic class type constraint with a generic class having another constraint
Let's say I have a generic class
public class G<T> { }
and I want to declare final class as
public class F<T> where T : G<T> { }
that seems to be possible, but what if I want to complicate the task and add a constraint to the class G like that
public class A { } public class DA : A { } public class DB : A { } public class G<T> where T : A { }
and finally I want to do this
public class F<T> where T : G<T> { }
that does not work, it says T has to be of type A which is understandable and it looks like I can rewrite it like this
public class F<T, U> where T : G<U> where U : A { }
but in this case the usage has a redundant declaration
public class DF : F<G<DA>, DA> { }
I have to repeat DA twice when using class F even though it is quite clear if I use G as a generic type the generic type of G is DA. Is there a way to avoid this redundancy?
-
Cascading databound <ajaxtoolkit:combobox> and <asp:dropdownlist> in asp.net
I have an
asp.net
search form that includes anajaxToolkit Combobox
and a standardasp DropDownList
. Both controls are bound to two separatedSqlDatasource
components.Something like this:
<ajaxToolkit:ComboBox ID="cbConvenzionato" runat="server" AutoCompleteMode="SuggestAppend" DropDownStyle="DropDownList" DataSourceID="sdsConvenzionati" DataTextField="nome" DataValueField="id" AutoPostBack="true" OnSelectedIndexChanged="cbConvenzionato_SelectedIndexChanged" /> <asp:DropDownList ID="ddlVeicoli" DataSourceID="sdsVeicoli" DataTextField="targa" DataValueField="id" runat="server" AutoPostBack="true" OnSelectedIndexChanged="ddlVeicoli_SelectedIndexChanged" AppendDataBoundItems="true"> <asp:ListItem Text="TUTTI" Value="" Selected="True" /> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:SqlDataSource ID="sdsConvenzionati" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:db %>" ProviderName="<%$ ConnectionStrings:db.ProviderName %>" SelectCommand=" SELECT id, nome FROM anag_convenzionati ORDER BY nome;" /> <asp:SqlDataSource ID="sdsVeicoli" runat="server" EnableCaching="false" CancelSelectOnNullParameter="false" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:db %>" ProviderName="<%$ ConnectionStrings:db.ProviderName %>" SelectCommand=" SELECT id, targa FROM veicoli_contratti WHERE ((@id_convenzionato IS NULL) OR (id_convenzionato = @id_convenzionato)) ORDER BY targa;"> <SelectParameters> <asp:ControlParameter Name="id_convenzionato" ControlID="cbConvenzionato" PropertyName="SelectedValue" Direction="Input" ConvertEmptyStringToNull="true" DbType="Int32" DefaultValue="" /> </SelectParameters> </asp:SqlDataSource>
There's also a third
sqldatasource
(sdsNoleggi
) that feeds agridview
but this's not a problem right now.In code behind I have two event handlers:
protected void cbConvenzionato_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { sdsVeicoli.Select(DataSourceSelectArguments.Empty); Search(); } protected void ddlVeicoli_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { Search(); } private void Search() { sdsNoleggi.Select(DataSourceSelectArguments.Empty); }
I tought in this way I should filter
ddlVeicoli
items after selecting an item incbConvenzionato
... but it's not working... why?If I look into
sdsVeicoli
SelectParameters
in debug I can seeid_convenzionato
being correctly set to selected value (id coming fromcbConvenzionato
) I bet also thatsdsNoleggi
dataset wiil be correctly updated with new values since I did this many times before. So why bound control it's not? I tried also to force addlVeicoli.DataBind()
aftersdsVeicoli.Select()
call ... but this had no effect. -
Swagger UI not working for REST API (asp.net web api2) application
I have asp.net mvc project with .NET Framework 4.7.2 and the same project contains asp.net web api2 controller in a separate folder : Controllers. The solution is legacy. The API are already in use in the PRODUCTION environment. Now I added the Swagger nuget package (Install-Package Swashbuckle -Version 5.6.0) to this existing project. Post that I see a SwaggerConfig.cs added to the App_Start folder of the Solution Explorer.
Here the asp.net mvc controllers are used by App1 pointing to the server: www.app1.com and asp.net web api2 controllers are used by another frontend angular app: App2 pointing to the server : www.app2.com
The complete deployment package for both App1 and App2 are hosted in IIS
Any request related to App1 is handled by www.app1.com and any api request related to App2 (Angular frontend) is handled by App1 only using IIS Rewrite rules at App2 level which redirect any api request to App1 only.
Now in this case when I tried to navigate to www.app1.com/swagger , I see it is loading the SwaggerUI for me, but when I tried to navigate to www.app2.com/swagger it is not working and instead of that it is loading the Angular frontend application
Here goes the App1 and App2 at IIS level:
Can anyone help me here by providing their guidance to fix this issue?
-
Cors error missing allow origin header. MailKit
I have
cors error missing allow origin header
error only on ONE post request. My CORS Policypublic void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services) { services.AddCors(options => { options.AddPolicy("AllowAllOrigins", builder => { builder.SetIsOriginAllowed(_ => true) .AllowAnyHeader() .AllowAnyMethod() .AllowCredentials(); }); }); }
Every request work fine, but one POST request fails, it's really weird. Code in controller action which failed use MailKit and SMTP to send email, maybe that's cause
-
CKeditor4 angular appy custom directive or pipe angular 9
Please suggest the way how to add custom directive on CKeditor4 angular.
-
Config.js file in django-ckeditor not applying configurations
I have been trying to style Django-CKEditor by modifying the
config.js
file, all to no avail; my custom configuration inconfig.js
is not working. I have gone as far as manually modifying the default CSS files, but all these modifications fail to work as well. Although when I use Chrome'sdevelopers tool
to make some modifications, they all worked. My question is, is theconfig.js
file not usable in Django?config.js
CKEDITOR.editorConfig = function( config ) { // Define changes to default configuration here. For example: // config.language = 'fr'; // config.uiColor = '#AADC6E'; config.uiColor = '#000000'; config.enterMode = CKEDITOR.ENTER_BR; config.width = "100%"; config.height = "300"; config.extraPlugins = 'autogrow'; config.autoGrow_minHeight = 250; config.autoGrow_maxHeight = 600; };
settings.py
CKEDITOR_UPLOAD_PATH = "images/avatar/" CKEDITOR_IMAGE_BACKEND = 'pillow' CKEDITOR_RESTRICT_BY_USER = True CKEDITOR_CONFIGS = { 'default': { 'skin': 'moono-lisa', 'toolbar_Basic': [ ['Source', '-', 'Bold', 'Italic'] ], 'toolbar_Custom': [ {'name': 'styles', 'items': ['Styles']}, {'name': 'basicstyles', 'items': ['Bold', 'Italic', 'Underline']}, {'name': 'colors', 'items': ['TextColor']}, {'name': 'links', 'items': ['Link', 'Unlink', 'Anchor']}, {'name': 'insert', 'items': ['Smiley']}, ], 'toolbar': 'Custom', }, }
HTML
<script type="text/javascript" src="{% static 'ckeditor/ckeditor/ckeditor.js' %}"></script>
- Disable prefers-color-scheme: dark in django admin